Explict Symmetry Interpretation


✾ Fractionless Trajectories

The smallest number to describe a motion must be consistent region of measure included. Composite motion, kɒmpəzɪt məʊʃ is motions combined to one motion reducing similar motions. Subjectively forming some constant(s) aspect in composite motion functioning. Well defined locations of movement points before, of consciousness reality then combined. Then the once perceived movements before combined lost? Let us look at a simple movement points charting vertically, movements to combine the underscores:

••••••••••••_____•____•__•_•••
•••••••••_______•___••__••••••
•••••••_______••••_•••••••••••
••••______••••••••••••••••••••

{4,3,2,1} ⭚ the combination to one composite movement. 10-1 of separate consciousness functioning movement points to one, and possible 24 movement points multiplied altogether, from a well defined locations consistent in movement regions relevant to this subtopic. Now let’s see this further; as a emitting chunk of some other composite movements combined, to some scaled abstract attraction of movement points before. The separate dense composite movement combine of {4,3,2,1} becomes m-4/◭C, assuming some m-4/◮C equivalent to symmetry pair. The compression memory inbound to either ◮C or ◭C, of some intertwined constant(s) in linear consensus angles, fundamental to a least known symmetry of further composite movements combined. Perspective becomes important of combining composite movements together, whereof total relevant possible previous movement points do have great effect, ◐ ◑ ◒ ◓ and axis combinations cropped to a perspective expansion or not of horizons matching multiplied/added. The scale fractionless in combined modal reoccurrings of least movements. In Hebraic centric terms is מינימלי אֶלִיפְּסָה reflecting, or natural ellipse minimal trajectory revolving from more and more composite movements combined very related to natural gravity effects. Is consistent with asymmetric inflation structure regularity also, if a combined composite movements reactions determinable along a pairing axis from outer distance constants found.


✾ Zero & Movement Symmetry

Conformity of loop count, any other rival theory irrelevant. The transmit of pairing sides, as of the number 10, then decided loop return of one count symbolic. A corresponding composite movement loop position(s) to explicit symmetry interpretations, still stable predictions of angular relapse bordering in timeline intersections. Implicit of loop curving indifferences linear, k=(a(aB)*b(A))/2 such is controversial to perspective regions allowed. Your ten digit hands do not include a nothing finger. Anything in certainly inflation contained from infinite one, circular return conclusive. Fine regularity not invented by us.


✾ Electrons

We’d cover only one electron on one wave? How prestigious a task of explaining… Essentially is the exact same symmetry prone electron published, however the uncertainty of principle texture more in. The unique solution of determining this, maybe from very sudden accelerations matched indirectly by nonspinning frequency halted from a faster compression. Flatness in intervals a essence, however not altogether flat.


❃ Totality

Fewer steps of insight lead less baggage. Nevertheless, all functional to vibrations, subjective consciousness whole. Real true explicit symmetry breakable? Only if you are God.

Deep Crate Notation


✾ Introduction

Some numeric sequence… {4,128,31,5,8} a added in series total of 176 and a multiplied series together of 634,880 count. These two new numbers alone can’t reflect back the original sequence, however do. Getting back the original sequence of numbers would involve mind reading, or other surveillances/retaining specific to the source that formed the sequence. The main beginning information needed is how many separate numbers are in the sequence, before any more operations in getting back the original sequence. Upfront you could make some solid reasoning, that one or two numbers of the sequence is significantly more from the large between difference of the added and multiplied totals. The other reverse pattern analysis combined, without mind reading or surveillance a Deep Crate Notation, DCN. A non-property methods in operations needed for a Acronym Compiler’s registers, previously explained of it’s basics on a past blog post. Basic mathematics easily explained as is this intro, though the abstraction levels in between rather complex of comparison to on, off, or both on and off intersections met. What is viewed after… wham is all new and consumed of the previous.


✾ A Set Table

What more pairings of a 176 to 634,880? The average separate pairings of 176 in 634,880 is 3,607.272 by division only. If the pattern of {4,128,31,5,8} carried on further of more separate numbers added or reduced, the average 3,607.272 can be of some abstract subtraction/addition significance retained of any more separate numbers added or reduced. The more direct reflection of how many separate numbers, within the pattern before or after remains unknown …a method applying of a three from four, division separate of multiplications, additions, and subtractions grouped? Let’s look at that: Multiplication, addition, and subtraction integrated into a one single interface operator combined, not retaining a property of division further of a pattern recognized. Reduction is the subtraction operation, the other two are of increasing, multiplication & addition.


✾ Sublimity of Transfer

A interface is a point where two systems meet and have interaction(s). On topic, we are needing systems of multiplication, addition, and subtraction as one single operation point paired to the operation of division interfaced. Reduction is of the subtraction parameter only, to be combined of addition & multiplication. Let’s look at another pattern similar:

—M—S—A—A—M—S—
—S—A—M—S—A—S—
—A—M—S—A—M—A—
—M—M—A—S—A—S—
—S—A—M—A—S—M—
—A—M—S—M—S—A—

From this simple arrangement in rows & columns of [M]multiplication, [A]addition, and [S]subtraction we can apply a X, Y, and Z integration further at central meeting point of the two. (see my “The Acronym Compiler” blog post) In relevant pairing comparison the S, Subtraction is reduction of two to the Acronym Compiler previously explained of basic origins. Qualifying a significant merge of addition and multiplication of any end points to a pattern, or sequence further. A timeline of this unique interface of standard math operations merged, of spacetime slicing rather than normal encapsulation pairing of linear timeliness. There must be equal table pairing of any intersections merged, whereof division *visible after of before any X, Y, or Z plane merged of pairing axis equal.


❃ Texture vs Measure

All texture is a product of Pi from measure(mathematics) ruling. There is no escaping it in the before and after. Each vibrations inhabiting the structure of what is not naturally visible is origami recycle in abstract nature of planes merging, or separated. Once a plane of X, Y, or Z is emerged of another pairing X, Y, or Z then excites the underlay pattern hold to retain it’s area possible. Too much texture combined, any property state of both on and off must be consumed further in the next underlay pattern to hold moreover. Declaration of other one operator from a three of four standard natural math operators, interfaced of remaining operator frequently employed by just one such interface instructed within spacetime allowed ✡✝ Quantum Computers of tremendous power belong to the LORD that is in power now. Any man, or woman that rejects HIM will be rejected by HIM. As before and now, I own none of the mathematics explained.

Rods of God


✾ Static Electricity

The usefulness of static electricity gathered as a reliable source of electrical energy supplied. Main focus, the circumstances of applying substantial increases in current to voltage supply, from static electricity gathered. A system of a unique battery and the environmental placement. There is places on Earth of sand and wind, that fit the scope of a ‘Rods of God’ fieldings. Each rod being double hull and further surfaces underneath it’s mounting to grounding. The exposed shell made to maximize the static electricity gathering; the second inward shell attachment of the rod being integrated into the unique battery system, that over phases the process of increasing current to voltage reliable, throughout two separate arrangements of oscillating the build up of electrical energy. Thus explained so far, whereof several hundred Rods of God in a field causes electromagnetic disturbance near the area. The mechanical & electrical processes of the rods turning off and on not by wireless means. Also peaceful staff communication at the site by other communication strategies more reliable.


✾ Exotic Metals

Today’s accumulation in the knowledge of rare metals includes exotics combined together, or partly merged in a binary property agents to bonding further by chemical or heat applying. Some of the processes of retaining electrical significance in combined exotic makes, improving specific tunneling collects at certain regions of the structure to the bondings made. Static electricity can reach very high levels of voltage quickly in substitutes of exotic metal pairings, and additional violations in mass structuring rendered in forming processes occurred naturally. The greater weight to a static electricity gathering rod of God being inner, than altogether. Whereof the unique battery system, that creates needed current by oscillation of a certain other exotic rare metal. Of liquid and explosive, however not being detached over Earth as a downward dart. Circumstances of environment heat very apparent also, and the interference several Rods of God being arranged near in rows can cause. Special developments of re-circulation inside the rods by rotation and shielding of regions within rated atomic. No overly simple way of producing reliable electrical energy, from natural static electricity gathering as well known.


✾ Origami

Origami type applications to surfaces is also unique to three different electrical subjects moreover. First, being rotation situations in maximizing a static electricity gathering on a plating. This involving artificial intelligence adapting environment conditions uniquely met also. Second, circumstances of the oscillations being applied to the more central task of the exotic battery storages and release elsewhere preventing heat build up. And the third region, being how the rod is of grounded structure to the pairing shells of the rod underneath, whereof connections met arrayed.


❃ Impossible vs Possible

Every thing visible and not visible has a sets of mathematical arrangements to rules of engagement, by being visible or not. Many of them include electrical integration from vibration, or oscillation of abstract points further. Some circumstances allow insight into obvious reverse engineering paths, in natural electrical tunneling conditions effected outwardly of it’s constants. Such matters as tasking static electricity a reliable energy source, not to be confused with no peaceful agreements. Of conclusion to any further questions arising on this unique technology in the future.

The Acronym Compiler


✾ Double Minus Dancing Trims

The pairing of two axis and a one connect thru of either the X, Y, or Z plane has ten ending points altogether. A double minus of 12-2 pairing of three way duality end points. If Y is the merged plane of only two end points now, rather than previous four then X4Y4Z4 != X4Y2Z4 long. A numeric palindrome occurrence of 424, whereof XYZ the common read order. And the entire XYZ numeric palindromes of 424 double acronym trim rule mixed further, keeping a XYZ order at left begin or right begin verticals:

☞ L to R

——X4Y2Z4——X4Z2Y4——
——Y4X2Z4——Y4Z2X4——
——Z4X2Y4——Z4Y2X4——

L to R ☜

——Z4Y2X4——Y4Z2X4——
——Z4X2Y4——X4Z2Y4——
——Y4X2Z4——X4Y2Z4——

[⚐ Of a quantum type relational to 12 restored individual into the combinations, there is a absolute condition of opposite vertical group endings to either ZZY or YXX, and double matching middle immediates opposites, whereof a static middle numeric palindrome 222 always unless viewed apart.]

Each set of these palindrome 424 acronym mixed sets is 9 letters & numbers. Four sets total equaling 36 letters & 36 numbers altogether combined, rather than standard 32. Where is the extra 4 coming from directly? The observation held of the two axis before pairing, having now one merged plane of either X, Y, or Z. In that of ZZY and YXX combined is ZZYYXX. And from that observation of restored, a palindrome sequence of ZZYYXX or XXYYZZ is XYZZYX exclusively only to a common acronym of it met either left or right in standard XYZ reading recognized. However, needs a merged after observation of either X, Y, or Z… such as XYZYX after observation of Z plane merged?


✾ Virtual Post Assignment Instruction Sets

A Fajita has these three main objects to be my favorite food: Steak, pepper, and tortilla. SPT the acronym. When a further grooming with XYZ is to be of some type instructions on previous ruling, then is the accumulations of forming virtual post assignments, if numeric mergings to be rotational palindrome met. Introducing a double state majority, or minority endings to matrices rendered of any instructions previous/after. Sharks do not naturally jump out of the water tail first because of consumption. Let’s consider a instruction set:

shrkA(S1P3T1, X4Y2Z4);
shrkB(P3T1S1, Z4Y2X4);
q = (shrkA*shrkB)/3

Territory Y is the exact same end points merged in this set, and relative to a first RtoL of S and T being also some virtual merged subset of the acronym SPT. However, there is a 3rd matching precedent before this. The conditional abstract layer of 4 to Z or X, in that of some virtual multiplication then division result, both shrkA and shrkB we’re prededuction held of it’s palindrome numeric existence of 131 to 424. Whereof combined for further multiplication was a significant 3:2 ratio of palindrome retained further. Of 1 and 4 collapse in virtual mixed acronyms mixed further, yet still retained of the mixed acronym’s singular holdings.


✾ Propriety Routing Instruction Sets

Thus far understood. A leverage tasked of virtual post assignments met in compression of palindrome/acronym sequencing before memory changed, doesn’t solve a appendage of grouped balances into instruction sets further routed of a same, to form some central task achieved of either two mirrored. In symmetric terms {of previous explanations to X, Y, and Z a two way vital preconditioning paths are absolute of either X, Y, or Z merging further. That basis flow over any mixed palindrome acronym sets leads a sequential significance to three adaptations in allowed multi-configurable algorithms chosen.


❃ Poke-a-dot Bikinis

Humanity vision is held together by free radical observation already constructed long ago. Involves ordinary rational deductions and rare rational deductions, of objects viewed in there set allowed perspectives for us pairings. If two objects are of a similar same properties, then technique found in enumeration compressed further by both multiplication or division. Normally we do not see multiplication sequences holding deduction. Of example two woman standing on a coast line, having a seemingly exact poke-a-dot bikini on of same colors(acronyms). The further we observe, becomes tougher to calculate if is any difference in size of the poke-a-dots between the two bikinis. However, of multiplication comparisons in color zooming can be established from outer pair comparisons reliable. The outer merging essences of the beginning structure explained, retaining a relevant merge in observations of three perspectives to two states end points not merged further. I hope you enjoyed this and happy to answer any questions you have, when allowed. The basic mathematics shown I don’t own.

Block Channel Arch Trees


✾ Unpaced Cryptic Sequencing

Any exponential change of pairing, within paired compounded set arrangements further will default to a halting of the outward limitations at some time. Also the problem of virtual human generation simulations, to meet the physics requirements in both classical and quantum attainment whole of some backup return. A unfavorable semicircle by definition, from it’s pre-design limitations being met half first of any knowns, before any solving task finished in pairing completion complete into a whole achievable return. It is a “pump and dump” as future intelligible reasoned and response, or virtual mechanism formed like that of a disposable camera is the current blockchain. In that the compounded arrangements of pairing further, generally semicircle symbolized not being met abstractly of the whole return back via binary analogous Pi comparison expansions chartered a specific discernment to any virtual system underlying it, unless unlimited energy qualifying is met. Now of a unpacing cryptic sequence of pairing compounded, pronounces unique identified cryptic pairing layers to each chosen search/find stage length blocks unconditional attained from it’s abstract state conditions of unique combinations possible, not in allowed unfavorable symmetric halting together met of halves increased. That the expansive request of the pairing blocks, in residual format of previous pairing mixed to a also virtual outside container asymmetric joining to finite expansion of de-expansion arrangements, having the interchangeably access to dissect half haltings in multistage request succeeding any exponential change causing the sudden halting. The mathematics to explain on this, a basic lesson in fundamental block channel arch trees, involving sequential vertical sub-layering cryptic profile keying to a nonpairing smaller first limitations, than a full scale traversed block channel arch cryptic sequential system, that further needs the requirements of quantum computing. Some terms to use seemingly vague in exploring the outward limitations of finite virtual systems in cryptic integrated arch retrievals, however necessary. I will also use some technical Hebraic terminology to numbering forms comparison of other enumeration systems’ disadvantaged in palindrome numbering reduction/multiplying.


✾ Filling Ice Trays

Palindrome numbering fills a void, whereof is an immediate paired comparison of digits in a number recognized, without further operations done. Very important in three multireverse ways further. Two, it’s not just a odd or even number anymore. And yes, has a return of the same number either left or right as a *whole. You can see a palindrome number holding both an expansion quality not to be palindrome further, or de-expansion quality retained in it’s expansion sub-sequentially pairing further in expansive matchings category of comparison to arch pairing block balances. For me to go further in seemingly more complex explanations in importance of palindrome numbering, that all is rather balanced to One than nothing…… more commonly un-achieving here to lesson because you have the ‘fear of nonexist’ implanted into your mind from Eden’s Intruder. That’s not your fault. And understanding such a numbering system involves a high learning curve from explanations in two dueling center faultings being used of the common numeric system, zero and the decimal. The decimal being the biggest center comparison problem of a true palindrome numbering system balanced to One always. Now, of a ice tray you must fill it with water in blocks before the ice blocks are returned, then for more fillings nearly paired. All the blocks are the same volume if filled perfectly even, however you are not Eve. You probably fill the ice tray with water to it’s maximum overflowing, then pour from a corner of some leveling done to accommodate the expansion not to overflow. Doesn’t matter if the pairing of the ice blocks are perfect, just as so they don’t create a sheet of connected ice over them, halting a reasonable loosening for the return of the ice blocks. This interaction from you mathematically involves a leveling channel of *virtual cryptic terms, between volume and pairing limitations l=b(v-p>v/p)+(l*l/2) whereas l limitation, v volume, and p pairing broadcast abstractions to a vertical expansion cryptic sequences further to key pairing allowed. This does not comply a algebraic interposed position of n directional mapped to any divisional circumstances further of b/(v+p) in a same retained matches found, or searching further. Whereof virtual limitations of halves combined, discussed earlier of a knowingly compounding to a area in time span capable of de-expansion in expansion infinite. There must be some type search switch above in pre-condition of p to l, if facing each block’s filled position next closer arranged, by loose/near repetitions encrypted of some balancing average retained forming virtual unbreakable by our own each interactions with it.


✾ Analogous Branch Switch Interference ABSI in Binary Block Search Accumulations

Of Hebraic “Cheyim” to a always cyclic returns of any and everything, then the answer to 0/0 is 11/10 reasonably to what is ultimately created doesn’t return void if a complete member to a completed one whole member, and capable of a returning one property of structure allowing one return pairing returned. However, the same pairing folds answer also shows the problem of the decimal upfront and personal; and leads to very stranger than mathematical fiction qualities of quantum mechanics being right in front of you the entire time; further into relativity hidden subjects in a already setup precise movements from the projected particle vibrations controlling gravity and wavelengths *projected circular within within. And where the very strange subject of programming can be skipped to a analogous switch interference, used as a leverage between encryption points AB layering intersections to expansion in de-expansion compounded encrypted blocks. No knot can be so entangled it cannot be untangled. If I say no knot can be so untangled it cannot be entangled, then is the interference of a AB preconceived condition being formed, more over is analogy pre-arrangement limitations to a virtual infinite returning. Of block sequence compounding relevance, both AB are both entangled and untangled. In Hebraic pictograph terminology, the horizon symbol, “Qof”. Behind each seen balance of entangled, or untangled is still a return point pairing made from not our own interactions alone, however from what was already behind rounded so. This introduces a certain mathematical formula to binary spanned layering relational, to paired compounded further reasonable to a system search/find expansions, in expansion from virtual de-expansion at some arrangement loose/near leveling to entangled/untangled lengths of splitting not deforming the entire blocks readability.


❃ Dependence Informed Encrypted Layering Interpretations

Each living thing God has created, includes a occupied observation of pairing central to awareness. Is the multiplying of our visible horizon made for us, in that we understand life is a pairing involuntarily to our existence. Any virtual layering by us to ons and offs, holds both matching to the visible horizons made for us to experience. Thus of the previous explained, uniform to measurements in lengths, also subjected to a involuntarily pairing virtually by use in length encrypted sets compounded in further blocks retained. Whereof a(b-A<aB-1)/n of some length point set, then is the pre-configuration of other previous algebraic rhythm no less both entangled of a begin of untangled. Even if perhaps aB>a+A/2 has significant role of divisional de-expansion horizon to a expansion of AB one whole. Proceeding a further compoundings of arch strength, wherever a split is necessary yet still retaining the formation of it’s channeling. Further comparison studying would be wrapped expansion in matrix noise spectrums, inverted fraction sum lengths in binary search sets, and conditional operator changes, in those inverted fractional sum lengths for set comparison branchings to encrypted paths expanded. Bitcoin? Anything being used in a greed atmosphere is sabotage, whether claimed virtual or not. And of this post, not surprisingly Bitcoin is going to obviously run into a wall from trusting in other Masters and ugly.

The Impossible Computer Language


✾ Cats Memes

The impossible computer language for the most outstanding nobel achievement? A binary mobile sensitive supergray particle app, within many nested abstract class multi-layering capabilities of recycling real fine dusty book shelves into galactic needle mirrors of a constant 98, that could then reposition us in the visible ether as cat food for loved felines. However, scannable memes of recognized internet felines such as grumpy cats, would be recognized for certain work passes; as well as small soda servings available for manual labours. Each man, woman, kid, and child having limited access to high speed internet further via prearranged bunker accommodations. The computer language would also include it’s own capable self replicating test hidden in ancient encrypted Unicode matrices, so it’s developers can shadow ban any kids capable of rewriting the language outside the bunkers, into it’s floating arrayed interpreter settings below the other mirroring constant sets allowed in accommodation art gallery viewings. Decided secret interchangeability of the language would expand it’s cross-platform packages to dwarf stars, with enough property transparent energy transfer to blow up spike worms via virtual SNC4-GPSX loop reversed listed exception pointers, joined to indirect ground penetration string symmetries obfuscated. All it’s keywords having very strict parameter security wrapped into it’s core directional methods to be further executed, constrained to the observer of being floating chop sticks eating noodles and seated bearded martial artist painted as cats, if thru the first layer of those security sub-keys. In the emergency of no scannable internet cat memes further…


✾ Fake News Archives

(See aisle Zero for Disappearing Dogshet.)

The Internet Part


✾ Memory and Scripting

As is the internet now, crowded of fame driven crowd sourcing gatherings of likes, loves, reactions, and bots? It all becomes obsolete and laughed at in the future. Two important circumstances happen, before it all becomes tagged in the tacky era box of the internet. First, there will be a huge expansion in cheap memory available and will be in the micro peta bytes capacities. The other second more importantly is advancements in AI, scripting language aspects, and subset protocols made easy for websites creation and maintainable. Both of those areas in technology allow incredible duplication of social media pages, articles, news, and etc. Of more simpler terms, a vast number of youth terminating the fame driven social media sphere you see today by copying in sarcasm of today’s internet social media philosophies. And the large technology companies combatants of it being very overwhelmed in how to stop it.


✾ Social Hubbing

The current type social media apps you interact with everyday, will change greatly in the area of audience viewables, called Social Hubbing Commons. Everything sub-sliced into many categories discreetly arranged to the viewer/editor as a social hub interactions from connected content by the connected users exclusively as a whole, rather than a vote gaining base mentality controlled in clicks. Much of it greatly changed by how search engines will have to reconfigure to the accompanying changes as well. The future of social apps also very different in how identification(s) is preceded, within peer involvements pertaining to subjects of interest. The situations of topis/comments/editing closed more sharply in timelines than now, as is likeness of technical/science support forums seen now; and those specific multimedia layer regions integrated constrained further also, terminating a bubble controlled fame driven social medias altogether. Social media that doesn’t exactly comply with new Social Hubbing aspects in the future, and it’s sub-routine privacy media similarity interactions, observed as new wine in old skins. And trying to hide the old fame driven social media into a new Social Hubbing Commons format in the future, or trying to smooth it in somehow becomes attacked in duplications, sarcasm of it quickly.


✾ Video and Videos

Today’s video subjecting and video viewing is entangled in the similar aspect of fame driven social media. What happens in this region is more control by other sites, gained from vast memory storage readily available cheaply. The youth involved in changing the video streaming/viewing, will chain together certain Social Hubbing Commons, with regular web search and interactions of the layered topics arranged and controlled by community abundantly. Meaning the often listed database tagging of videos & media being available for viewing/download across mamy regions of sub-protocols non-componded to restrained storage aspects. And with that they characterize a host of watcher apps restricted in privacy matters to Social Hubbing Common sub-layer identifications, that don’t include a basis of advertising agendas at all.


❃ Knocking at the door

You may think a conclusion on this would be just to expand more on the technical areas as said, however much is more involved than just technology alone. Many people now are seeing and feeling the drain of the same old fame driven social media controlled, and those people conform to it in a certain way now. They further wish a aspect and respect not so one sided in control of their opinions and life matters. Leaving what is coming much more open, than restricted to their lives outside of social media interactions; and seeking a different more positive outlook to not trust fame driven social media that has brought on vast fake news circumstances, in a society as a whole wondering left out by gears of cruel modern money capitalism. It was once said in a Yahoo Chat Programming Room in 2003, a time of computer hacking not seen coming so widespread, to never under estimate script kiddies in large numbers. Karma, giants fall with great thud.

UPDATE:

– This image was found after a Google Image Search of “javashript”, there was only 5 image results. Seems likely there is other time travelers on the internet besides just me. You just have to know where to look…

Synoptic Anti-Kinetics


✾ Propagation of R-Distances

Neglected approximations evenly across a set, that does hold to a distinct properties of length operating sets within; and of/without incident of a combined distance in coherent phase exceptions is a R-Distance, or rD. Assuming a same measurable position is stable and non-destructive of any diffractions. Any corresponding angular position before and after rD, that allows an intensity condition of mass in extended transitions is radial dependence of greater center locale normally. Let us determine a pre-distribution set within approximate regions of a rD to {11, 22, 33, 44} The means propagation travel in this set is 27.5 normally, though combined distance means of 55 if any 3 distance values disconnected of another singular value to retain outer approximates. And with this known, s/((aB-a)+rD-b)n of further regions converged of any approximations held more abstractly. Given a set plane described, resolving split merging distance planes maximum of any pre-convergent averages invariant to traveling point dissections. The reflecting carry overs by matching deductions unpredictable of it’s set product incident means further. Yet, increasing the length of sets as measured into variations of distance interferences as shown. Thus combining rD sets will reduce smaller approximates to be gained from larger neglected set distance averages; and being more and more unattainable thru calculated means distance separations once were. A folding of timed distance keys in paired dynamics of/without combined lengths folded of outer means distances measurable.


✾ No longer than a slit

The more narrow a series of points becomes structural integrated to a dividing center, then is terminal substitution of those points becoming conditional and also pre-conditional. Let us apply an environment of distances first, taken we have a chart of single digit numerical distance points pre-arranged:

–6–3–9–2–1–9–9–4–1–9
–3–1–5–2–9–3–3–0–1–5
–5–5–2–1–3–5–4–3–3–8
–7–3–4–1–8–3–3–3–2–1
–5–3–0–9–3–4–1–3–9–1
–3–9–2–3–4–9–2–1–4–2
–7–3–9–3–1–4–3–2–8–3
–1–4–6–2–9–4–0–9–2–1
–9–3–3–5–2–8–2–1–4–2
–5–4–2–9–2–3–8–1–3–9

From this certain arrangement of distances, we know it is a 10th of width & height structure to a single digits format. If substitution of any motion passing thru this area, we also know the obtained settling of changed numbers will apply patterns conditional to it’s previous state held and not entirely lost. Continuing by percentages of {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} previously held to any distances combined and after. Let’s observe a different type distance points chart, where a rD passing occurred:

-6–4-1-9–2-9–3–3-1-0-4–9
–5-3-9–1–0-4-3–2-9–3-1-6
-4–3-2-1-0–3-3–6-3–2-8–1
-8-4-4–3–9-1–4-3–5-2–8-2
–4–2-1-8–3-9-3–2-9–3-2-7
-5–3-2–8-9-3–0-0-3–2-8–2
-9–3-5–4-3-2–4-8–2–0-3-5
–7-3-0–2–1–8-3-2–7–4–0
–3-9–2-1-7–4-8–2-9–3-5-9
-7–3-8-0–4–1-4-9–1–0-4-6

(This is a mere random example in visualization to binary terminal substitution effected.)

And now tangent calculations must be performed to approximate individual distance splits, rather larger neglected. The dashes representative of a converged or further split distances to merge or not.


✾ Alternate Speed Projection

Collapse of a wave function in quantum mechanics by observation is irreversible. Is it then undesirable to assume speed as a function of observation collapse? If you’re combining some existing theory respected in values, of some preferred basis speed is also a projection properties state. Classical representation of speed is binary, velocity & distance. Linear laws of quantum mechanics is absolute. The relations of unitary and non-unitary, apart of some structure modeling place held of a place, then is projection of extents derived other possiblest. One extreme, or other extreme in subject of alternate speed projections happening at some parallel medium known or unknown.


❃ Identical Unbalance

Represented identical values that are changed; and not expressed in observation are both suspended and functional operations to a rD algorithmic sets distances merged. Any physical system’s exertions in probability process collapse has pre-conditional limitations in both velocity and distance. That of each state of a process described contains an adjacent and tangent expression to overlap a previous rotated space encompassing it’s own static modeling permissions.

סָב֯ך*)

Momentum Capacity


✾ Entire Improvements

A finite linear displacement, capable of a instantaneous combined matching space, into a then any direction of momentum in maximum velocity began at merge cannot be an advocate of any time zones justified whatsoever. Suggesting a full unit of rotation work consumed outer to inner immediately, and/or avoids an illegal beginning magnitude of torque altogether by initial displacement collapse cutoff, reduced to a angular speed of intersections from no instantaneous acceleration on merged to an ending intersection torque loaded range met unequal… Equivalent to transmitting energy saturated beyond a average larger area of energy consumed, but terminal decreased of a present constant of any matching maximum velocity lesser than before. What could happen? Obvious very rare crystal defects, if any crystal containing atmosphere present at the event. And should also be a strong enough event to disintegrate any clutch conceivable. Let’s call it a Clutchless Event, without being over any of God’s policies in Godspeed.


✾ Entire Centers

You did learn 1+1 before 1-1. The dependence of 2 was needed to understand reduction by ones and further on. Providing you also expressed your own unique interpretations of distance between twos, A & B. And by definition a constant above definitions, you derived distance as a conversion factor to measurements of heights and lengths. An equation a product of two, the equal or non-equal. If a number is 0 or 1 is said binary, however is still basis to two sum value system regardless of further combinations combined. Count placements in palindrome numbers, numbers that result a same counting whether read from ☜RL and LR☞ all can become nonpalindrome numbers of a single change of a digit, except for a change in the center digit of a triple, and or further ➢•/ length enumerations having the one center digit balance. Is representative of all equal revolutions in a counting system already balanced to a one center all corresponding. Concerning palindrome mathematics not overlooked in speed × time.


✾ Entire Replicas

There is theory of ballistic transport common to smaller device circuitry being made of more compactness; and of the velocity overshoot problem. In respect of factors to decreased distance vs distance rates; over any range of uniform loop, some requirement of a ending force is already directed. Mentioning above substitutions, Στ = 0 each displacement intersected. Not mere change to any angular velocity unmatched, rather in lower condition of field strength before replication. If some carrier substituted, of some derivation period in varied entry, rather length standard indifferences.


❃ Entire Conclusions

GMT standard time was declared the legal time form on August 2, 1880 in Britain. Some clocks at that time had two minute hands, one for GMT and local time. Eight days later I was born on the 10th of August. I don’t admit to understanding much French, however in the past known to purposely watch loud movies in French with texting enabled. And having nice neighbors completely unaware of my whereabouts at times. If you found some sense in all of this, then you are crazy also. The only elite thing about me.

The Paradox that is not


✾ Conversion Redundancy

Parrondo’s paradox is the possibility to play two losing games alternately to eventually win. And of more directly why, there is the paradox of infinite placement. If everything that exists has a place, that place must have a place, and so on infinite. All mechanical operations are classified to a virtual quality paradox. The paradox includes an infinite compatible, and a infinite incompatible objective of desired operation over unset times of awareness not closed. That in the type approval operations alone is not, dependent on operation usage shared into infinite possibilities of conversions leaving compatible & incompatible seemingly irrelevant to now. Occupying a limited range of interesting topics in reverse engineering thought processes. Location and time of a given area depends upon a receiver. The receiver’s location and time must also be selected further, of some conversion understood between the two. In radio transmitting comparisons, an original modulation received is from demodulation after the signal is increased. The same amount of information in conversion processing, done infinitely leads to redundancy in conversion references between location and time. However location and time has no betweens, only now. If we can throw a phone into a tv, and the tv teleport a conversion of location and time somewhere else back to us on the phone. What placement between is to further the conversion(s) of location and time exact of now, if the phone is now incompatible/compatible to be teleported previously into a so called original state of now? The virtual linking assigned of compatible between incompatible becomes anomaly in infinite redundancy for us viewing infinite, into making subset operations within holding further in now, not nows. Everything is already made more simply understood, the one answer to both Parrondo’s paradox and the infinite placement paradox.


✾ The Upside Down Duplex

Often paradoxes will provide a illusion of now blurred, with segmentation focused on a begin and end to linger grasp more over. This allows the paradox statement to shift in a more temporary psychological circumstance of infinite, rather than a one true infinite state recognized. However some time paradoxes, such as taking rare copies of materials in the past to a future locked container, to later retrieve more copies before the first time achieved is all so relevant in comparison of infinite and now restricted blocks. Conversion of compatible and incompatible future paradox that is not, only now. The upside down duplex example contains resident observers, that change their conversion processing over time to compatible and incompatible living circumstances upside down. That enough time passes in the location of time, the residents become incompatible with upside duplexes, however still compatible unknowingly if so. It stems the access of dependent operations vs suspended operations technically. Many environment issues can be added to the upside down duplex in changed interactions, however not so clearly the betweens of background limitations of now; and range of applied passive responses in being both compatible and incompatible to your own calculated viewing by third party observations.


❃ Compressed Detection

If a thousand operations of a system can be compressed into one singal operating method, then the receiver was consistent in determining indications of compression allowed. Keyless systems often replay a short range of conversions compatible between incompatible, in limiting the weakness by compression received. Initially referencing keyless systems in comparison to a multiple now of operations in a system, allows untraditional patterns to be surfaced in reduction of operations. Time paradoxes a enjoyable reads as always, yet be not fooled in redundancy to conversions hanging in no balance to one. And any paradoxes such as this sentence is false, inception.