Explict Symmetry Interpretation


✾ Fractionless Trajectories

The smallest number to describe a motion must be consistent region of measure included. Composite motion, kɒmpəzɪt məʊʃ is motions combined to one motion reducing similar motions. Subjectively forming some constant(s) aspect in composite motion functioning. Well defined locations of movement points before, of consciousness reality then combined. Then the once perceived movements before combined lost? Let us look at a simple movement points charting vertically, movements to combine the underscores:

••••••••••••_____•____•__•_•••
•••••••••_______•___••__••••••
•••••••_______••••_•••••••••••
••••______••••••••••••••••••••

{4,3,2,1} ⭚ the combination to one composite movement. 10-1 of separate consciousness functioning movement points to one, and possible 24 movement points multiplied altogether, from a well defined locations consistent in movement regions relevant to this subtopic. Now let’s see this further; as a emitting chunk of some other composite movements combined, to some scaled abstract attraction of movement points before. The separate dense composite movement combine of {4,3,2,1} becomes m-4/◭C, assuming some m-4/◮C equivalent to symmetry pair. The compression memory inbound to either ◮C or ◭C, of some intertwined constant(s) in linear consensus angles, fundamental to a least known symmetry of further composite movements combined. Perspective becomes important of combining composite movements together, whereof total relevant possible previous movement points do have great effect, ◐ ◑ ◒ ◓ and axis combinations cropped to a perspective expansion or not of horizons matching multiplied/added. The scale fractionless in combined modal reoccurrings of least movements. In Hebraic centric terms is מינימלי אֶלִיפְּסָה reflecting, or natural ellipse minimal trajectory revolving from more and more composite movements combined very related to natural gravity effects. Is consistent with asymmetric inflation structure regularity also, if a combined composite movements reactions determinable along a pairing axis from outer distance constants found.


✾ Zero & Movement Symmetry

Conformity of loop count, any other rival theory irrelevant. The transmit of pairing sides, as of the number 10, then decided loop return of one count symbolic. A corresponding composite movement loop position(s) to explicit symmetry interpretations, still stable predictions of angular relapse bordering in timeline intersections. Implicit of loop curving indifferences linear, k=(a(aB)*b(A))/2 such is controversial to perspective regions allowed. Your ten digit hands do not include a nothing finger. Anything in certainly inflation contained from infinite one, circular return conclusive. Fine regularity not invented by us.


✾ Electrons

We’d cover only one electron on one wave? How prestigious a task of explaining… Essentially is the exact same symmetry prone electron published, however the uncertainty of principle texture more in. The unique solution of determining this, maybe from very sudden accelerations matched indirectly by nonspinning frequency halted from a faster compression. Flatness in intervals a essence, however not altogether flat.


❃ Totality

Fewer steps of insight lead less baggage. Nevertheless, all functional to vibrations, subjective consciousness whole. Real true explicit symmetry breakable? Only if you are God.

2 thoughts on “Explict Symmetry Interpretation

  1. All I need is just 7800 now; and the money loving America Babylon Whores can kiss my mathematical as# out of here. Plans elsewhere, where respected you degenerate tech giants.

    Like

Leave a comment